Give Recruiting Teams Source Channel Memory That Reveals What Actually Works
Recruiting source channels — LinkedIn, referrals, job boards, niche communities — perform differently per role and per time. AI sourcing tools see one search at a time. MemoryLake gives recruiting teams source channel memory across roles, years, and outcomes.
Give Recruiting Teams Source Channel Memory That Reveals What Actually Works
Get Started FreeFree forever · No credit card required
The problem: source channel performance opacity costs the team
You're hiring a senior backend engineer. Three months ago you hired a similar role. Which channel produced the hire? Which produced quality conversations? Which wasted time? The data lives in ATS columns nobody analyzes between hires.
How MemoryLake captures source channel memory
Per-channel reflection memory
Performance patterns across roles.
Per-role-type source effectiveness
What worked for similar searches.
Event memory of source outcomes
Conversations, screens, hires per channel.
Cross-tool retrieval
ATS, LinkedIn, sourcing tools unified.
Free forever · No credit card required
How it works for source channel memory
- Connect — Authorize ATS and sourcing tools.
- Structure — Per-channel performance becomes typed memory.
- Reuse — New searches retrieve source channel guidance.
Before vs. after: recruiting source channel memory
| Without MemoryLake | With MemoryLake | |
|---|---|---|
| Source channel ROI clarity | Opaque | Memory-driven |
| Cross-role channel learning | None | Reflection memory |
| New role kickoff | Generic channel mix | Memory-recommended |
| Audit channel decisions | Limited | Memory provenance |
Who this is for
In-house and agency recruiting teams where source channel optimization is supposed to compound but data isn't actionable today.
Related use cases
Frequently asked questions
ATS integrations?
ATS integrations?
Greenhouse, Lever, Workday, Ashby — supported.
Privacy?
Privacy?
AES-256 E2E.
Free tier?
Free tier?
Yes — for small teams.